Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Chad R(dot) Larson" <chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>, Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)
Date: 2001-07-12 19:00:16
Message-ID: 11647.994964416@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> ... I don't believe that anything as large as PIT recovery is
>> going to magically appear out of the woodwork.

> Someone told me they would do it. I will not disclose their name
> because I don't think I have the right to do that.

And if "hacker X" delivers a patch that large a week or so before beta,
with no prior discussion of features or implementation techniques on
the mailing lists, we'd accept it? Hacker X needs to be told that
that's not how this project is run.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-12 19:01:53 Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-12 18:48:20 Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)