Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
Date: 2001-05-17 04:27:28
Message-ID: 200105170427.f4H4RSr09434@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> I have JDBC2 here, and can test the compile. I am focusing on the CVS
> because I have major jdbc patches back to February already applied.
> There are so many fixes in CVS now, I am not sure how valuable 7.1.2
> jdbc will be even with this one patch.
>
> I certainly will not be applying any jdbc stuff to 7.1.X. I was told
> not to apply stuff during beta. I am sure not going to apply anything
> to a minor release.

One more issue is that I am thinking JDBC will be similar to ODBC in
that it will start releasing more frequently, independent of our major
releases, Both interfaces need more frequent feedback to users.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-05-17 05:05:37 Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-17 04:15:41 Re: Patch for jdbc ResultSet.getTimestamp()