Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Date: 2001-01-19 19:50:02
Message-ID: 200101191950.OAA06850@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Got it. Corrected TODO.detail.

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > So, we probably should put new free dirty buffer just before first
> > undirty one in LRU.
>
> Ops - new free UNdirty buffer before first DIRTY one in LRU,
> sorry -:)
>
> Vadim
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-19 19:52:13 Re: test/locale broken
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2001-01-19 19:47:59 Re: select within a fucntion