Re: Re: JDBC Performance

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gunnar R|nning" <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>
Cc: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, PGSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Date: 2001-01-17 21:21:07
Message-ID: 200101172121.QAA08445@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

I am just going through my mailbox, and see that I applied this on
October 8:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

revision 1.7
date: 2000/10/08 19:37:54; author: momjian; state: Exp; lines: +37-17
Okay, I have some new code in place that hopefully should work better. I
couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
created new files and anonymous cvs usage doesn't allow you to
adds. I'm supplying the modified src/interfaces/jdbc as a tarball at :
http://www.candleweb.no/~gunnar/projects/pgsql/postgres-jdbc-2000-10-05.tgz

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can you confirm that it is OK now? Your email from October 18th below
seems to indicate it is not correct. Can I get a diff against the
current CVS source that I can apply? Thanks. Sorry for the confusion.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>
>
> > > couldn't produce a full patch using cvs diff -c this time since I have
> > > created new files and anonymous cvs usage doesn't allow you to
> > > adds. I'm supplying the modified src/interfaces/jdbc as a tarball at :
> > > http://www.candleweb.no/~gunnar/projects/pgsql/postgres-jdbc-2000-10-05.tgz
> >
> > Got it. Don't worry about the diff, I'll merge it in manually. At this
> > stage, it will be easier, and less prone to generating bugs with the
> > changes I've got here.
>
> Hmm. I just grabbed the latest source from CVS and it seems to be that my
> first version and not the latest one who is merged in(or maybe it was Bruce
> who did that...). Anyway the version in CVS is buggy and should be replaced
> with the version from October 5 pointed to in the mail quoted above. The
> current changes in CVS needs to be backed out one way or the other.
>
> If you need any help, I can create a new version based on the
> current CVS image.
>
> regards,
>
> Gunnar
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fred Yankowski 2001-01-17 21:25:36 how to obtain latest beta release?
Previous Message Robert B. Easter 2001-01-17 21:18:09 Re: Sequence Help

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gunnar R|nning 2001-01-18 12:57:01 Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Previous Message William Webber 2001-01-17 00:36:58 Patch for jdbc Makefile