Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> >> Not to bug you Peter, but 7.0 may not wait three days before release.
>
> > I would vote that this is important enough that it should wait, but no
> > one has raised the issue until now so we haven't discussed it.
>
> My two cents: I wouldn't object to postponing release a day or so for
> it, *but* if what we're getting is an un-beta-tested driver then my
> level of enthusiasm drops considerably. I'd rather say "it'll get
> fixed in 7.0.1, after a decent testing interval for the new driver".
>
> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now
> work with 7.0? If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver
> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs. If the answer is
> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got.

As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas. The driver must
have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version. Only since I
installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026