From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epamail(dot)epa(dot)gov> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Ordering a date_part() query ... |
Date: | 2000-01-18 18:28:40 |
Message-ID: | 200001181828.NAA05364@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > I have a query that looks like:
> >
> > SELECT ( date_part('month', stat_period) || '/' ||
> > date_part('day', stat_period) || '/' ||
> > date_part('year', stat_period) || ' ' ||
> > date_part('hour', stat_period) || ':00:00' ) as "Summary - by
> > Day/Hour",
> > sum(impressions) as impressions, sum(click_thru) as click_thru
> > FROM banner_count
> > GROUP BY "Summary - by Day/Hour";
> >
>
> Try appending ORDER BY "Summary - by Day/Hour"::date
> to your query.
Oh, much better than my CASE idea. I thought he was sorting date/time
strings, not datetime values.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Volpe | 2000-01-18 18:49:30 | Re: [SQL] Ordering a date_part() query ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-18 18:26:55 | Re: [SQL] Ordering a date_part() query ... |