| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart) |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] exp() changes |
| Date: | 1998-12-04 17:17:11 |
| Message-ID: | 199812041717.MAA19109@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Thumbs up on the math changes; my Linux box behaves better than it used
> to (so our "reference machine" will match the expected results).
>
> So, should we look at catching integer overflows while we are at it?
> Right now those overflow silently...
I would be surprised if you can catch them.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-12-04 19:45:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Case statement ready? |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-12-04 16:40:33 | exp() changes |