Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again
Date: 1998-10-27 23:18:38
Message-ID: 199810272318.SAA03714@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Someone checked in code that assumes vsnprintf() exists.
>
> Should be cool, we have an emulation right? Well, no.
> configure sets up to build port/snprintf.c if snprintf()
> doesn't exist. HPUX, for one, has that but not vsnprintf.
>
> I guess the right fix is for configure to check for *both*
> snprintf and vsnprintf --- anyone see a problem with that?

Oops, that was me, today. Patch attached. This is not the time to be
adding new portability calls.

Comments on how to handle this?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 0 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-10-27 23:19:12 Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-27 23:14:21 Re: [HACKERS] Configure problem, redux (was Re: TCL installation troubles)