From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Time to fix libpgtcl for async NOTIFY |
Date: | 1998-05-22 04:36:32 |
Message-ID: | 199805220436.AAA19514@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> There's some risk of breaking existing applications, since the apps
> might not be prepared for pg_listen callbacks occurring except at the
> specific time they execute pg_notifies. But that doesn't seem really
> likely to be a problem. Besides, since both these commands are
> undocumented, I imagine not very many libpgtcl applications use them.
> (A quick search of the archives turned up only a message from Massimo
> Dal Zotto about this topic, and he seemed to agree that getting rid of
> pg_notifies would be better.)
>
> Any comments?
Yep, get rid of the old stuff. I am sure people didn't use it because
of the performance problem. Your cleanup will make it use-able.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stupor Genius | 1998-05-22 05:27:41 | RE: [HACKERS] Bug in postgresql-6.3.2 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-05-22 04:33:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in postgresql-6.3.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Gould | 1998-05-22 07:00:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1998-05-21 23:13:35 | Time to fix libpgtcl for async NOTIFY |