Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2015-11-25 09:41:16
Message-ID: 19843356.CygdiLMRRO@dinodell
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 25 November 2015 13:27:33 you wrote:
> That was years ago, mind, but I
> haven't seen CMake exactly taking over the world since then.
KDE, MariaDB, neovim and etc. New projects usually selected CMake.

> Many prewritten CMake modules fail to follow basic practices that make them
> work anywhere but where the author wanted/needed.
Now everything is much better. And it is worth split "make" and configuration.
CMake better GNU Make and is similar to the m4 for configuring. But M4 older
and elaborated.

These are my feelings on the current work.

Thanks.
--
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2015-11-25 10:18:29 Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2015-11-25 09:19:38 pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups