| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Another pgindent gripe |
| Date: | 2005-11-07 14:45:22 |
| Message-ID: | 18296.1131374722@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I have another gripe regarding pgindent. Why does it change indenting
> of function declarations?
What it's doing is indenting the additional lines in the same way as
they'd be indented in the function definition, that is
static void foo(int p1,
int p2);
static void
foo(int p1,
int p2)
{ ...
I've always thought this was pretty stupid, too --- I think it'd look
nicer as
static void foo(int p1,
int p2);
But I dunno whether it is easily fixable. It's always done that AFAIR.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-11-07 14:59:48 | parameterized limit statements |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-11-07 14:37:49 | Re: Getting table name/tuple from OID |