From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
Cc: | nathan wagner <nw(at)hydaspes(dot)if(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: uuid type for postgres |
Date: | 2005-09-06 15:38:57 |
Message-ID: | 18228.1126021137@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc writes:
> My personal preference is that the type be called 'uuid' and accepted
> into the core. Tom? Is their history on this issue?
> Should it remain an extension, or can be get it built-in?
There is pretty much zero chance of being accepted into contrib, much
less core, if the code isn't pure BSD license. (We used to be a bit
lax about that, but are trying to clean things up.) Nathan's comment
about starting with code that was sorta-BSD-with-advertising alarmed me.
However, you can certainly set up a pgfoundry project with code of any
license you like. That would be a good starting point anyway --- at
some point you'd have to convince people that there's enough demand
for the feature to justify putting it in core, and being able to point
to X number of downloads from pgfoundry would go a long way towards
making that case.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matt Miller | 2005-09-06 15:51:41 | Re: Simple tester for MVCC in PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Mark Wong | 2005-09-06 15:37:26 | Re: dbt-4 (tpc-app) kit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-09-06 17:02:43 | Re: uuid type for postgres |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-09-06 15:33:56 | Re: POSIX Regular Expression question |