Re: [BUG] Archive recovery failure on 9.3+.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Archive recovery failure on 9.3+.
Date: 2014-01-09 20:36:55
Message-ID: 17318.1389299815@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> On 01/09/2014 10:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Don't we want to archive both? If you want to recover to the end of the
>> old timeline, you're going to need that file too, no?

> Hmm. It should be the responsibility of the original server to archive
> the segment on the old timeline.

Oh ... I was thinking about the case of a timeline switch within one
server, say as a result of PITR recovery. If you're sure this same case
doesn't come up that way, then nevermind.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-01-09 20:43:15 Re: [BUG] Archive recovery failure on 9.3+.
Previous Message Oskari Saarenmaa 2014-01-09 20:34:10 [PATCH] pgcrypto: implement gen_random_uuid