Re: [Review] pgbench duration option

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ragnar <gnari(at)hive(dot)is>
Subject: Re: [Review] pgbench duration option
Date: 2008-09-11 23:55:09
Message-ID: 16633.1221177309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Are people satisfied that the Windows part of the patch is okay?

I went ahead and applied this patch after some trivial stylistic fixes.
The buildfarm will soon tell us if the WIN32 part of the patch compiles,
but not whether it works --- would someone double-check the functioning
of the -T switch on Windows?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-12 00:05:00 Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2008-09-11 23:48:34 Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec