From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net |
Cc: | PGSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system) |
Date: | 2000-10-22 00:13:24 |
Message-ID: | 1655.972173604@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net> writes:
> so I tried going back to '7 Oct 2000 10:00:00 PST' and it's better,
> but regression tests fail on the rule system. It makes the server
> die. Since rules are what I want, this won't do.
Details? AFAIK, the system was operational on 7-Oct; I did not pick
that date out of the air. There was a broken version of the
expected/rules.out file in place right around then --- see
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out
But that'd just have caused a bogus comparison failure, not a server
crash. (What was *in the expected file* was a report of a server
crash :-(, so if you didn't look carefully at the diff you might've
gotten confused...)
If you want a more exact timestamp, try 7-Oct-2000 00:00 PDT which
predates the BEOS patch breakage, or 8-Oct-2000 00:00 PDT which follows
cleanup. If either of those fail on your system it'd be useful to know
about.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-22 01:04:09 | Re: to_char() dumps core |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-22 00:10:03 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS |