Re: Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net
Cc: PGSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system)
Date: 2000-10-22 00:13:24
Message-ID: 1655.972173604@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net> writes:
> so I tried going back to '7 Oct 2000 10:00:00 PST' and it's better,
> but regression tests fail on the rule system. It makes the server
> die. Since rules are what I want, this won't do.

Details? AFAIK, the system was operational on 7-Oct; I did not pick
that date out of the air. There was a broken version of the
expected/rules.out file in place right around then --- see
http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out
But that'd just have caused a bogus comparison failure, not a server
crash. (What was *in the expected file* was a report of a server
crash :-(, so if you didn't look carefully at the diff you might've
gotten confused...)

If you want a more exact timestamp, try 7-Oct-2000 00:00 PDT which
predates the BEOS patch breakage, or 8-Oct-2000 00:00 PDT which follows
cleanup. If either of those fail on your system it'd be useful to know
about.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-22 01:04:09 Re: to_char() dumps core
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-22 00:10:03 Re: Re: [PATCHES] Patch to support transactions with BLOBs for current CVS