| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Date: | 2011-09-18 16:43:32 |
| Message-ID: | 16304.1316364212@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On sn, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote:
>> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said.
>> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should
>> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works
>> outside the project is of no use at all.
> Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate?
+1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do such
a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for
appropriate purposes. I guess the real question is, exactly what will
be the requirements for joining?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rinaldi | 2011-09-18 19:08:01 | Grouping Sets |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-18 16:21:08 | Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels |