From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Grzegorz Jaskiewicz" <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Date: | 2008-12-09 13:11:24 |
Message-ID: | 162867790812090511u15a58a2dle999c3c251d94712@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/12/9 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>:
> if I may request one simple change/addition, Probably trivial to add, but I
> don't have too much time to give away now to any other project than one that
> pays my debts.
> The default param that's in the middle. Would it be hard, or do anyone
> objects against adding 'default' keyword there, so one doesn't have to
> substitute default param 3, when he only wants to override 2nd in
> funct(1,2,3) ?
>
>
I don't plan it, or not yet, because I don't would to complicate rules
for using it. But for 8.5 I prepare named notation and maybe mixed
notation. like param1 => some, param2 => some ..
Regards
Pavel Stehule
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-12-09 13:13:32 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2008-12-09 12:53:49 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |