Re: Table partitioning for maximum speed?

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table partitioning for maximum speed?
Date: 2003-10-10 21:18:25
Message-ID: 16263.8737.739152.441756@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "JL" == Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)nsd(dot)ca> writes:

JL> BULL.
JL> How many times does PG have to scan the whole table because of MVCC?
JL> At least with partitioning there is a fighting chance that that won't be
JL> necessary.

Huh? His specific query was "WHERE md5 = '....'". Why on earth would
that force a sequence scan if it were an indexed column? Heck, the
btree index should rule out 15/16ths of the rows after the first
character comparison.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-10 21:20:03 Re: Unique Index vs. Unique Constraint
Previous Message Jonathan Bartlett 2003-10-10 21:14:35 Re: Interfaces that support cursors