Re: State of Beta 2

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-23 17:42:25
Message-ID: 16240.34305.34558.91056@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "MGF" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:

MGF> I've tried restoring a >5gig database with sort_mem up to 100Meg in size,
MGF> and didn't find that it sped up the index creation enough to make a
MGF> difference ... shaved off a couple of minutes over the whole reload, so
MGF> seconds off of each index ... and that was with the WAL logs also disabled
MGF> :(

Ditto for me. Can you reproduce my results by increasing
checkpoint_buffers to some large value (I use 50)? this shaved
something like 60 minutes off of my restore.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-23 17:48:41 Re: State of Beta 2
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2003-09-23 17:39:00 Re: State of Beta 2