Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Overall, I don't see much reason to tinker with this. If we had no
> reporting at all of this condition now, I'd probably be mildly more
> supportive of adding a log message than a counter. But since we've
> already got something and there's no real problem with it, I'm
> disinclined to make a change.
+1 ... if it ain't broke, why fix it?
regards, tom lane