| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Benjamin Reed <ranger(at)befunk(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Libpq is not a shared library on Mac OS X |
| Date: | 2003-01-09 21:44:33 |
| Message-ID: | 15566.1042148673@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> One thing I like about the patch is that it introduces a differentiation
> between run-time loadable modules and build-time linkable libraries, which
> is something I've wanted to do for a while. Even on platforms where this
> isn't technically necessary we could choose better file names, such as
> plpgsql.so instead of libplpgsql.so.0.0. I'd prefer if a more general
> term than "bundle" is used.
That bothered me too. Got a suggestion for a better name?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-09 21:50:08 | Re: Libpq is not a shared library on Mac OS X |
| Previous Message | Hubert depesz Lubaczewski | 2003-01-09 16:40:30 | Re: dropping user doesn't erase his rights. |