Re: psql possible TODO

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Harris <lists(at)spuddy(dot)org>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql possible TODO
Date: 2006-12-05 22:34:58
Message-ID: 14864.1165358098@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Harris <lists(at)spuddy(dot)org> writes:
> Silly: You could even do \r xyz and load the buffer with the last line
> beginning xyz

We've got that: control-R xyz.

The thing I'm having a hard time with here is the notion that command
number is a convenient way of identifying prior commands. It seems like
an idea that should have gone out with punched cards.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-12-05 22:42:31 Re: psql possible TODO
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-05 22:34:13 Re: psql possible TODO