IDENT and IPv6 (was Re: [GENERAL] pg_hba.conf change in 7.4)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: slgan(at)lucent(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: IDENT and IPv6 (was Re: [GENERAL] pg_hba.conf change in 7.4)
Date: 2003-12-06 19:09:25
Message-ID: 14531.1070737765@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

[ moved to -hackers ]

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> We are also wonder if there is a version of Ident server
>> that the PostgreSQL community knows that will work
>> with IPv6.

> That is the big question. I would think Solaris ships with one, but
> maybe not. Is 7.4/Solaris/ident not a workable combination? Folks?

Has anyone tested our Ident support under IPv6 on *any* OS?

Right offhand I don't see anything in the RFC 1413 protocol that would
break in moving from IPv4 to IPv6, but that doesn't mean there isn't
anything. One issue that catches my eye is that RFC 1413 assumes that
"port number" is a unique identifier of a connection within a particular
host; that assumption might be shaky in a system that's got multiple IP
addresses. (In particular I wonder whether IPv4 and IPv6 will share a
common port number address space on a system handling both ...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kurt Roeckx 2003-12-06 19:21:17 Re: IDENT and IPv6 (was Re: [GENERAL] pg_hba.conf change in 7.4)
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-12-06 18:55:58 Re: 7.3 --> 7.4 C Functions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kurt Roeckx 2003-12-06 19:21:17 Re: IDENT and IPv6 (was Re: [GENERAL] pg_hba.conf change in 7.4)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-12-06 18:44:03 Re: Double linked list with one pointer