Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Date: 2001-01-12 03:08:12
Message-ID: 14092.979268892@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
>> I'm unhappy again. Bad enough we accepted a new feature during beta;
>> now we're going to expect an absolutely virgin contrib module to work
>> everywhere in order to pass regress tests?

> Last I checked, two contrib modules had to be built for regression
> testing.

Sure, but they've been there awhile. All of my concerns here are
schedule-driven: do we really want to be wringing out a new contrib
module, to the point where it will run everywhere, before we can
release 7.1?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lincoln Yeoh 2001-01-12 03:08:40 Re: Lock on arbitrary string feature
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-01-12 02:59:58 Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!