| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate |
| Date: | 2005-11-24 15:41:01 |
| Message-ID: | 13883.1132846861@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Is anybody opposed to having PL/php in pg_pltemplate in the 8.1
>> branch? If not, I will add it on monday. (I plan to add it to 8.2 at
>> the same time.)
> pg_pltemplate should only be used for languages that are included in the
> PostgreSQL source tree.
I don't see any strong reason for enforcing that as policy, if the
language maintainer wants an entry. (But is Alvaro the maintainer of
pl/php?) My recollection is that we identified some pros and cons of
having listings for non-core languages, and decided it should be up to
the language maintainers to decide what they want.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-24 15:45:11 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept |
| Previous Message | Pollard, Mike | 2005-11-24 15:38:12 | Re: MS SQL Server compatibility functions |