Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate
Date: 2005-11-24 17:07:24
Message-ID: 200511241807.25199.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't see any strong reason for enforcing that as policy, if the
> language maintainer wants an entry. (But is Alvaro the maintainer of
> pl/php?) My recollection is that we identified some pros and cons of
> having listings for non-core languages, and decided it should be up
> to the language maintainers to decide what they want.

Perhaps Alvaro can identify the reasons why he wants this done and then
we can determine whether it's a good idea.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2005-11-24 18:16:05 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-24 16:39:12 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept