| From: | "Pollard, Mike" <mpollard(at)cincom(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Mario Weilguni" <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bill Bartlett" <bbartlett(at)softwareanalytics(dot)com>, "Fredrik Olsson" <fredrik(dot)olsson(at)treyst(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: MS SQL Server compatibility functions |
| Date: | 2005-11-24 15:38:12 |
| Message-ID: | 6418CC03D0FB1943A464E1FEFB3ED46B01B220DD@im01.cincom.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
If you're referring to my procedure for newid(), then it was just
because of pure laziness; it was an internal proof of concept project,
and I was still concentrating on getting it working.
Mike Pollard
SUPRA Server SQL Engineering and Support
Cincom Systems, Inc.
--------------------------------
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and
remove all doubt.
Abraham Lincoln
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 5:57 AM
To: Mario Weilguni
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Pollard, Mike; Bill Bartlett; Fredrik
Olsson
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MS SQL Server compatibility functions
> Why do you use "GRANT ALL" and not "GRANT SELECT, UPDATE"? All means
everybody
> can do bad things with those sequences.
GRANT ALL on a sequence IS GRANT SELECT & UPDATE.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-24 15:41:01 | Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-11-24 15:22:27 | Re: NVL vs COALESCE |