| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jan Wieck" <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY |
| Date: | 2001-01-26 23:13:25 |
| Message-ID: | 13006.980550805@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> ISTM commands/trigger.c is broken.
> The behabior seems to be changed by recent changes made by Tom.
Hm. I changed the code to not log an AFTER event unless there is
actually a trigger of the relevant type, thus suppressing what I
considered a very serious memory leak in the non-deferred-trigger case.
Are there cases where we must log an event anyway, and if so what are
they? It didn't look to me like the deferred event executor would do
anything with a logged event that has no triggers ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-26 23:17:28 | Re: Permissions on CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-01-26 22:43:59 | RE: Bug in FOREIGN KEY |