Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jan Wieck" <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY
Date: 2001-01-27 05:20:19
Message-ID: 20369.980572819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Are there cases where we must log an event anyway, and if so what are
> they? It didn't look to me like the deferred event executor would do
> anything with a logged event that has no triggers ...

Oops, I missed the uses of deferredTriggerGetPreviousEvent(). Fixed
now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-27 05:25:24 Re: Bug in FOREIGN KEY
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-27 05:08:14 Re: new version of contrib-intarray