Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)
Date: 2010-12-17 15:24:48
Message-ID: 1292599469-sup-8382@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of jue dic 16 16:19:17 -0300 2010:

> The most performance issue of access to a untoasted array is "solved"
> with other patch.

Was the other patch applied?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-17 15:27:30 Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-12-17 15:24:17 Re: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c