Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Ben Hockey <neonstalwart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Date: 2010-05-19 06:19:35
Message-ID: 1274249975.6916.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2010-05-18 at 18:26 -0400, Ben Hockey wrote:
> ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i
> would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify
> interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly
> desirable.

Note that we haven't got any other datestyles that are intended to
support interoperability with some language. It is usually the job of
the client driver to convert PostgreSQL data (plural of datum) to the
appropriate type and format for the client environment or language. Is
there any reason why JavaScript would be different?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-05-19 06:25:44 Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-19 05:47:35 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)