| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) |
| Date: | 2010-05-17 11:14:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1274094899.28911.571.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 06:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I think we should review Masao's patch and ask him to make any changes
> > we think are appropriate. There's no benefit to have multiple patch
> > authors at one time.
>
> I did review his patch. It duplicates a few lines of logic and I
> found a way to avoid that, so I proposed it. That seems totally
> normal to me and I'm not sure what you're concerned about.
I think we should concentrate efforts on just one patch: Masao's.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-17 11:33:05 | Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-17 11:02:56 | Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) |