| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL Info messages |
| Date: | 2009-12-15 03:34:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1260848049.1955.3710.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 11:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I definitely wouldn't presume that anybody using Hot Standby would
> > necessarily want NOTIFY to reach the standby, especially if there was an
> > overhead to doing so. If using NOTIFY is the favoured approach, I would
> > add a separate parameter for it and/or an explicit option on NOTIFY.
>
> Yeah, I had just come to the same conclusion: you'd want a separate
> spigot handle on sending NOTIFY to WAL, regardless of any general flag
> about HS.
Anybody know the latest on in-memory NOTIFY?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-15 04:29:57 | Re: pgAdmin III: timestamp displayed in what time zone? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-15 03:32:20 | Re: Row-Level Security |