Commit Fest (was Re: Sort Refinement)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Commit Fest (was Re: Sort Refinement)
Date: 2008-03-21 09:23:17
Message-ID: 1206091397.4285.654.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 23:07 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:

> > Simon, would it be too much to ask that you concentrate on reviewing
> > existing patches during commit fest? Trying to get people to think
> > about random new ideas is about the most direct undermining of the
> > commit-fest concept that I can think of. Save 'em for later.
>
> That's a fair reminder, thanks, I will do that.

I'm a bit in the dark about this Commit Fest, to be honest.

Is this the list of patches to be reviewed?
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo:CommitFest

I was suspicious of that because it mentions "Minor changes to Recovery
related code" by Simon Riggs, which I'd already mentioned had been
committed more than 6 months ago.

ISTM that nobody has reviewed anything except you, Tom, from the list.
Is that true, or are there others working on reviews I can't see?

or maybe the patch list is this?
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo:PatchStatus

I'll review Tom Doran's and Dany DeBontridder's work.

Incidentally, I'm in favour of letting Heikki review his own work
because there's a backlog on index changes that appears to be months
long and he has a good chance of tackling that.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-03-21 09:36:34 Re: Integer datetimes
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-03-21 08:18:47 Re: How large file is really large - pathconf results