Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Date: 2008-01-21 15:00:37
Message-ID: 11d5bdebe8be0e41d270b1b86c555179@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> I read that Perl 5.10 is about to hit Fedora rawhide. Anyone know if
> it will work with plperl and/or DBD::Pg? If there are fixes needed
> in plperl, it'd sure be nice if they were in 8.3 ...

I've tested 5.10 against both and they seem to work fine. My plperl tests
are not necessarily thorough, but it compiled smoothly and ran a bunch of
plperlu code without a problem. DBD::Pg worked fine, all its tests passed.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFHlLMevJuQZxSWSsgRA4neAJoCJtcPusA86PBpZHsmnSWyeKroQACg1CcS
jVgOjqD8ousq5jxIJq3+Sbc=
=XzXA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-01-21 15:05:04 Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2008-01-21 13:17:16 Re: mklink of pg_standby