Re: mklink of pg_standby

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mklink of pg_standby
Date: 2008-01-21 13:17:16
Message-ID: 03fa01c85c2f$f16f9860$c601a8c0@HP22720319231
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>

>> Yeah, vote +1:-)
>> Probably, the equipment which is not Symbolic Link is needed in order
>> to correspond to XP and 2K. It is hard to use rather than 'SymbolicLink'.
>> It will be enough if notice are written to a document.
>
> The notice is *alraedy* in the documentation.
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/pgstandby.html
> has:
> "-l will not work on versions of Windows prior to Vista."

Ugaa, sorry this noise. , I had overlooked it.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-01-21 15:00:37 Re: Anyone tried PG with Perl 5.10?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-01-21 13:13:23 Re: mklink of pg_standby