Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WAL archiving is enabled

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jacky Leng <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WAL archiving is enabled
Date: 2007-10-17 10:26:43
Message-ID: 1192616803.4233.52.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 17:18 +0800, Jacky Leng wrote:
> Second, suppose that no checkpoint has occured during the upper
> series--authough not quite possible;

That part is irrelevant. It's forced out to disk and doesn't need
recovery, with or without the checkpoint.

There's no hole that I can see.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacky Leng 2007-10-17 10:42:28 Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WALarchiving is enabled
Previous Message Kuriakose, Cinu Cheriyamoozhiyil 2007-10-17 10:15:07 CVS Commands

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacky Leng 2007-10-17 10:42:28 Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WALarchiving is enabled
Previous Message Jacky Leng 2007-10-17 09:18:14 Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WAL archiving is enabled