On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 10:55 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> IMO, monitor_ seems weird versus track_. To me monitor implies actions
> to be taken when thresholds are met. PostgreSQL doesn't do that.
> PostgreSQL tracks/stores information for application to monitor or
> interact with and those application may doing something based on the
> tracked information.
Not that my opinion would count too much on hackers, but "track" sounds
better to me too, seems more to the point, not to mention it's shorter
too.
+1 "track"
Cheers,
Csaba.