Re: Replication Ideas

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication Ideas
Date: 2003-08-25 21:09:19
Message-ID: 11627.1061845759@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> writes:
> Yes I have. Postgres-r is not a high-availability solution which is
> capable of transparent failover,

What makes you say that? My understanding is it's supposed to survive
loss of individual servers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J.Henning 2003-08-25 21:12:20 Database recovery after fs crash
Previous Message Franco Bruno Borghesi 2003-08-25 19:58:48 Re: table constraints and performance

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlos Guzman Alvarez 2003-08-25 21:14:33 SSL Connections
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-25 21:04:28 Re: NOTICE vs WARNING

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2003-08-25 22:15:25 Re: Replication Ideas
Previous Message Jeff 2003-08-25 20:46:34 Re: What is the fastest way to get a resultset