From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication Ideas |
Date: | 2003-08-25 21:09:19 |
Message-ID: | 11627.1061845759@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> writes:
> Yes I have. Postgres-r is not a high-availability solution which is
> capable of transparent failover,
What makes you say that? My understanding is it's supposed to survive
loss of individual servers.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | J.Henning | 2003-08-25 21:12:20 | Database recovery after fs crash |
Previous Message | Franco Bruno Borghesi | 2003-08-25 19:58:48 | Re: table constraints and performance |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Guzman Alvarez | 2003-08-25 21:14:33 | SSL Connections |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-25 21:04:28 | Re: NOTICE vs WARNING |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2003-08-25 22:15:25 | Re: Replication Ideas |
Previous Message | Jeff | 2003-08-25 20:46:34 | Re: What is the fastest way to get a resultset |