Re: Index not being used

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Matthew Price" <pricem(at)juno(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index not being used
Date: 2002-02-15 03:52:00
Message-ID: 11611.1013745120@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> More to the point, it's not considered a constant.

> Why? Shouldn't it be constant for the duration of a transaction?

There is no such concept, at present. See the archives...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-02-15 04:06:11 Re: Index not being used
Previous Message David Terrell 2002-02-15 02:08:42 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu