Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Date: 2005-10-06 10:44:00
Message-ID: 1128595441.8561.36.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On K, 2005-10-05 at 19:54 -0400, Ron Peacetree wrote:

> +I made the "from left field" suggestion that perhaps a pg native fs
> format would be worth consideration. This is a major project, so
> the suggestion was to at least some extent tongue-in-cheek.

This idea is discussed about once a year on hackers. If you are more
interested in this, search the archives :)

--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2005-10-06 10:50:29 version dependent compilation
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-10-06 10:37:36 Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Westmacott 2005-10-06 12:56:31 Re: wal_buffers
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-10-06 10:37:36 Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?