Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Date: 2005-10-06 10:37:36
Message-ID: 1128595056.8561.32.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On K, 2005-10-05 at 13:21 -0400, Ron Peacetree wrote:
> First I wanted to verify that pg's IO rates were inferior to The Competition.
> Now there's at least an indication that someone else has solved similar
> problems. Existence proofs make some things easier ;-)
>
> Is there any detailed programmer level architectual doc set for pg? I know
> "the best doc is the code",

For postgres it is often "best doc's are in the code, in form of
comments."

--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-10-06 10:44:00 Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Previous Message Dmitry Karasik 2005-10-06 10:28:25 Re: prepared queries in plperl

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-10-06 10:44:00 Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Previous Message Michael Stone 2005-10-06 09:49:34 Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?