Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgdump

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>,Enrico <scotty(at)linuxtime(dot)it>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgdump
Date: 2005-01-17 04:59:50
Message-ID: 1105937990.22946.17.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 23:42 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I don't remember this patch.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00331.php

> How is it related to the other pg_dump
> patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?

I missed the July '04 discussion about the other patches for improving
-t behavior. AFAIK the patches are unrelated.

Something like the design elaborated here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-07/msg00374.php

looks good to me, and would be preferrable to Andreas' patch IMHO.
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see a patch from David Skoll in
that thread that actually implements the above behavior. I'd be happy to
implement Tom's suggested design for 8.1 unless someone has already
beaten me to it.

-Neil



In response to

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:42:23 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-17 05:06:25
Subject: Re: pgdump
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-17 04:42:23
Subject: Re: pgdump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group