Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 23:42 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I don't remember this patch.
> > How is it related to the other pg_dump
> > patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?
> I missed the July '04 discussion about the other patches for improving
> -t behavior. AFAIK the patches are unrelated.
> Something like the design elaborated here:
> looks good to me, and would be preferrable to Andreas' patch IMHO.
> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see a patch from David Skoll in
> that thread that actually implements the above behavior. I'd be happy to
> implement Tom's suggested design for 8.1 unless someone has already
> beaten me to it.
There were actually competing pg_dump -n patches in July. I think I
just kept the last one posted.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
- Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:59:50 from Neil Conway
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-01-17 05:08:37|
|Subject: Time to branch for 8.1?|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-01-17 04:59:50|
|Subject: Re: pgdump|