Re: pgdump

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>, Enrico <scotty(at)linuxtime(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgdump
Date: 2005-01-17 04:42:23
Message-ID: 200501170442.j0H4gNW23506@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 16:24 +0100, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/pg_dump.c.diff
>
> Looks good, except for some minor code cleanups and doc updates. Barring
> any objections, I'll clean it up and apply it once we branch 8.0. I
> suppose for consistency we ought to allow multiple schemas to be
> specified via the "-n" option?

I don't remember this patch. How is it related to the other pg_dump
patches in the 8.1 pathces queue?

> (Speaking of which, is the plan still to branch 8.0 very shortly after
> the 8.0.0 final release?)

I guess we could do that now actually.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:22:55 from Neil Conway

Responses

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:59:50 from Neil Conway

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-01-17 04:59:50 Re: pgdump
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-01-17 04:22:55 Re: pgdump