Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?

From: Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tablespaces a priority for 7.5?
Date: 2004-01-22 15:00:12
Message-ID: 1074783612.4336.1.camel@blackbox
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 07:38, lnd(at)hnit(dot)is wrote:

> Meaning incremental (hot)-backups?
> Or as protection against DROP/TRUNCATE/DELETE ALL TABLE/SCHEMA/DATABASE?
>
> With a WAL it should be doable in some 7.x version, all ingredients are
> there.
>
> Possibly someone suceeded in doing it already? Having a baseline backup and
> saved WAL logs, shouldn't it be possible to recover?

Incremental pg_dumps would be a huge step in the right direction!

However, unless I am mistaken, a baseline backup would need to be taken
cold because you cannot take a consistent online backup of the data
files without using file system snapshots or split mirrors, and even
that's questionable.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henk van Lingen 2004-01-22 15:07:40 Re: trust auth in 7.4
Previous Message John Wells 2004-01-22 14:58:47 Want a job?