Re: 4 Clause license?

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 4 Clause license?
Date: 2003-11-20 14:14:11
Message-ID: 1069337550.6596.51.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 08:34, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > I think maybe the simplest thing is for me to prepare a patch that rips
> > that code out and replaces it with a (slightly simpler - less umask
> > hacking required, I think) piece of code that I will write.
>
> The FreeBSD folks sorted it out for us.
>
> Everyones names should be in the copyright for the file. The licence
> portion should be the 3 clause version -- no advertising clause.
>
> I think borrowing should be encouraged, and now that we know what
> license / copyright we need to carry over, this can be done without
> worry.

Ignore that.. I hadn't read Terry's statement yet -- it got snagged by
the spam filter for some reason.

Since we have other code which has the same issue, I think this needs to
be solved. Can anyone show what Apple did?

--
Rod Taylor <rbt [at] rbt [dot] ca>

Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glenn Wiorek 2003-11-20 14:25:46 Re: question about fixes in v7.4...
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-11-20 14:10:22 Re: ALTER COLUMN/logical column position