"Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 9/21/08, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> Why? pg_service does not appear to support wildcards, so what is the attack
>> vector?
> "service=foo host=custom"
The proposal to require a password = foo entry in the conn string seems
to resolve all of these, without taking away useful capability. I don't
think that forbidding use of services altogether is a good thing.
So that seems to tilt the decision towards exposing the conninfo_parse
function. Joe, do you want to have a go at it, or shall I?
regards, tom lane