Re: Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl
Date: 2008-09-21 20:43:28
Message-ID: 10407.1222029808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hrm, I thought if anything we wanted to put them in pg_constraints (at
> least inherited ones). Now maybe I have defaults confused with NOT
> NULLs... But don't we want to be able to give defaults names and and
> such?

No, I think you're thinking of NOT NULL. There's no reason to have
names for defaults that I can see.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-21 20:49:28 Re: [patch] fix dblink security hole
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2008-09-21 20:43:08 Re: [patch] fix dblink security hole