Re: Postgres Crash Running PLPGSQL Function on 8.2.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gary Winslow" <gary(dot)winslow(at)atfs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Crash Running PLPGSQL Function on 8.2.3
Date: 2007-04-09 20:48:05
Message-ID: 10417.1176151685@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Gary Winslow" <gary(dot)winslow(at)atfs(dot)com> writes:
> I would be happy to provide a "self-contained" test case. I would have
> to send to you a pg_dump of it which would be rather large to send via
> email. Some of the code includes confidential business specific calc
> rules that I cannot release to the general public.

Understood; it won't go anywhere. But how large is "rather large"?
Can you duplicate the problem with no (or less) data?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Leon Mergen 2007-04-09 21:00:59 INSERT..RETURNING on a partitioned table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-09 20:41:56 Re: Can you combine text variable together to referenece a VIEW name ?